Nobel laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, says the idea of reconciliation was definitely not on the table when he met Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the Feb 25 election, last Sunday.
Soyinka has been sparring with a section of Obi’s team lately.
Obi had disclosed paying a visit to Soyinka, writing in a tweet that: “I cherish this Sunday visit which was intended to erase the needless misconceptions about the relationship between the great icon and the Obidient family.”
Join Our WhatsApp Channel for Exclusive Stories, News Reports, and Engaging Content. {Click Here}
Recall that Soyinka had described recent remarks of Obi’s running mate, Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed, as fascist and dictatorial.
Datti Ahmed had said during a programme on live TV that if Bola Tinubu is sworn-in to govern Nigeria on May 29, the nation’s democracy will come to an end.
Soyinka had berated Datti Ahmed for the comments in very strong language, a course of action which earned the former plenty of backlash and insults on social media platforms, from supporters of Obi who identify with the moniker Obidients.
After Obi’s visit to him, Soyinka has come out to say he doesn’t care about the Obidients and can’t possibly reconcile with them.
Soyinka writes: “Before it gains traction and embarks on a life of its own, I wish to state clearly that the word “Reconciliation”, inserted into some reports of Peter Obi’s visit to me yesterday, Sunday, May 7, is a most inappropriate, and diversionary invocation.
“Let me clarify: I know the entity known as Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party. I can relate to him. I know and can relate to the Labour Party on whose platform he contested elections. There are simply no issues to reconcile between those two entities and myself.
“However, I do not know, and am unable to relate to something known as the “Obidient” or “Obidient Family”. Thus, albeit in a different vein, any notion of Reconciliation, or even relations – positive, negative or indifferent – with such a spectral emanation is simply grasping at empty air.”
Soyinka also went on to elucidate on what transpired during the meeting he held with Obi.
“During that meeting, attended by two other individuals only, the word “Reconciliation” was never bruited, neither in itself nor in any other form. It simply did not arise. By contrast, there were expressions of “burden of leadership” “responsibility”, “apology”, “pleading”, “formal dissociation from the untenable”, all the way to the “tragic ascendancy of ethnic cleavage”, especially under such ironic, untenable circumstances. Discussions were frank, and creative. The notion of Reconciliation was clearly N/A – Non Applicable. It was never raised.
“The following should be understood but never underestimated. What remains ineradicable from that weekend of orgiastic rave in social media was the opening up of the dark, putrid recesses in the national psyche that we like to pretend do not exist.
“It invited – into minds seeking a grasp on reality – gruesome variations on images from Dante’s Purgatorio. A fathomless pit was exposed, at the bottom of which one glimpsed a throng of the damned, writhing in competitive lust for the largest of the gangrenous ladles in a diabolical broth.
“To peek over the edge of that pit for a prolonged spell was to turn giddy, with a risk of falling into the tureen of inhuman pus. To attempt to navigate one’s way, however gingerly, along a mat spread across the infernal abyss, is an invitation to moral suicide.
“For the serious-minded, I call attention to essays I have offered on the theme of Reconciliation based on Truth and the ethical imperative of Restitution. There will be further elaborations forthcoming in DEMOCRACY PRIMER III – Bookcraft’s INTERVENTION series now brought forward for publication on June 12, the watershed extorted from the current regime as the nation’s Democracy Day.
“If, from here on, I now comply with entreaties from several valued, genuinely concerned directions, and ignore new provocations, however vile, it is only because I also approve of Mohammed Ali’s strategy of Rope-a-Dope, where blind menace is left flailing hopelessly at the disdainful manifest of Truth.”